RODM vs. JSMD
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RODM returned 9.24%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for JSMD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSMD.
Performance
RODM vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than JSMD's 19.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 9.24%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.
RODM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
JSMD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
RODM vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.64% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.55% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and JSMD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between RODM and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
RODM vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RODM
JSMD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
RODM
JSMD
Industrials
RODM
JSMD
Technology
RODM
JSMD
Healthcare
RODM
JSMD
Energy
RODM
JSMD
Basic Materials
RODM
JSMD
Consumer Cyclical
RODM
JSMD
Communication Services
RODM
JSMD
Utilities
RODM
JSMD
-
Consumer Defensive
RODM
JSMD
Real Estate
RODM
JSMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
JSMD
RODM vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RODM | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 2.16 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 7.31 | +7.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RODM vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum JSMD drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and JSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -38.98% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -14.86% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -24.01% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -32.18% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | -38.98% | +3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | 0.00% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -7.46% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 4.38% | -2.60% |
Volatility
RODM vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.58%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 8.24% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 17.21% | -8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | 21.80% | -10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 22.99% | -9.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 22.83% | -7.61% |
RODM vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than JSMD's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.78% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and JSMD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to RODM (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs JSMD's -38.98%.
On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.87% vs 9.24% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.87% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.
RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JSMD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.30% for JSMD.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and JSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer