RODM vs. DBC
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RODM returned 9.24%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for DBC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
RODM vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 26.21% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 9.24%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.
RODM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
DBC
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 27.88%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
RODM vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.64% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 26.21% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and DBC is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.28 |
The correlation between RODM and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
DBC
RODM vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RODM | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 2.64 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 7.94 | +6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RODM vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -76.36% | +40.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -10.95% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -13.82% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -27.34% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | -41.71% | +5.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -26.99% | +26.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -46.19% | +39.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 3.64% | -1.86% |
Volatility
RODM vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.58%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 5.24% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 16.17% | -7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | 18.79% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 19.23% | -5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 17.82% | -2.60% |
RODM vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than DBC's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.64% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.78% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and DBC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to RODM (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 10-year performance, RODM leads with 9.24% vs 8.13% for DBC. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.64% for DBC.
RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBC is Commodities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.85% for DBC.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer