RODM vs. AVDV
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. RODM is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RODM returned 9.72%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for AVDV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
RODM vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 14.99% return.
RODM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 41.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- —
RODM vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 12.24% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 6.95% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 14.99% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 11.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and AVDV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between RODM and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
RODM vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RODM
AVDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
RODM
AVDV
Industrials
RODM
AVDV
Technology
RODM
AVDV
Healthcare
RODM
AVDV
Energy
RODM
AVDV
Basic Materials
RODM
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
RODM
AVDV
Communication Services
RODM
AVDV
Utilities
RODM
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
RODM
AVDV
Real Estate
RODM
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
AVDV
RODM vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RODM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.12 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.22 | 12.44 | +1.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RODM vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -43.01% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -13.19% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -14.17% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -28.08% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -2.24% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | -6.76% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 3.30% | -1.52% |
Volatility
RODM vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.54%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 6.26% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 13.88% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 16.25% | -5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 17.41% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 19.77% | -4.56% |
RODM vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than AVDV's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 4.11% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.77% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and AVDV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVDV has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to RODM (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.63% vs 9.72% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 9.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 2.77% for RODM.
RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer