ROCY vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ROCY (JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROCY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. ROCY is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROCY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

ROCY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ROCY

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROCY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF	11.21%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ROCY and QYLD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026	0.83

Return for Risk

ROCY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROCY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROCY	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.11	0.59	+5.52

Drawdowns

ROCY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROCY drawdown since its inception was -3.35%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCY and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROCY	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-24.75%	+21.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-0.06%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.33%	-3.84%	+3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROCY	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	8.57%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.85%	14.70%	-3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.85%	15.49%	-4.64%

ROCY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROCY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROCY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ROCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROCY and QYLD in my portfolio?

ROCY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROCY or QYLD?

On fees, ROCY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROCY or QYLD?

ROCY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROCY or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 1.62% for ROCY.

What is the main difference between ROCY and QYLD?

ROCY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCY and 0.60% for QYLD.