ROBT vs. TRUT
ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ROBT is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
ROBT vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 23.56% return.
ROBT
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 11.90%
- YTD
- 14.43%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 30.07%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 13.28%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBT vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 14.43% | 5.19% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 23.56% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBT and TRUT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBT vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
ROBT
TRUT
ROBT vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 2.25 | -1.90 |
Drawdowns
ROBT vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.47% | -18.55% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -2.83% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -5.16% | -10.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | — | — |
Volatility
ROBT vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.30% | 21.54% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 21.54% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.47% | 21.54% | +3.93% |
ROBT vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBT vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBT and TRUT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for ROBT and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer