PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBT vs. CRTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBT vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 8.59% return.


ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*

CRTC

1D
-1.08%
1M
4.98%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.79%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBT vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%12.30%
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
8.59%18.69%18.05%7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBT and CRTC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023

0.86

The correlation between ROBT and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBT vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBT
CRTC

Technology

57.0%
33.5%

Industrials

20.4%
14.1%

Healthcare

7.4%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
16.0%

Financial Services

1.6%
0.2%

Energy

1.5%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

6.0%

Technology

ROBT
57.0%
CRTC
33.5%

Industrials

ROBT
20.4%
CRTC
14.1%

Healthcare

ROBT
7.4%
CRTC
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ROBT
6.6%
CRTC
6.3%

Communication Services

ROBT
4.1%
CRTC
16.0%

Financial Services

ROBT
1.6%
CRTC
0.2%

Energy

ROBT
1.5%
CRTC
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

ROBT
1.4%
CRTC
0.0%

Basic Materials

ROBT

-

CRTC
2.6%

Real Estate

ROBT

-

CRTC
0.1%

Utilities

ROBT

-

CRTC
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBT vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CRTC
CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBT vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBTCRTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.64

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

9.88

-5.79

ROBT vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBT and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBTCRTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.87

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.36

-1.01

Drawdowns

ROBT vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and CRTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBTCRTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-19.07%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-9.05%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-1.27%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-2.13%

-13.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

2.41%

+5.12%

Volatility

ROBT vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that ROBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBTCRTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

3.20%

+3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.51%

9.64%

+7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.32%

12.76%

+10.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

15.73%

+9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.48%

15.73%

+9.75%

ROBT vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBT vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
1.00%1.03%1.13%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBT and CRTC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

On 1-year performance, ROBT leads with 30.71% vs 23.78% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROBT has performed better with a 30.71% return vs 23.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.35% for CRTC.

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBT and CRTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer