PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBT vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ROBT vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.03% return.


ROBT

1D
2.35%
1M
0.11%
6M
8.47%
YTD
8.60%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.94%

^GSPC

1D
1.48%
1M
1.57%
6M
8.95%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.29%
ALL TIME*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.00T$37.50T$41.55T
$2.76M$2.30M$2.96M

ROBT vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
8.60%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-14.66%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
11.03%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBT and ^GSPC is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2018

0.84

The correlation between ROBT and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBT vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROBT vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBT^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.31

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.41

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.80

10.22

-8.42

ROBT vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBT and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBT vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBT^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-56.78%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-9.10%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-18.90%

-8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

-25.43%

-17.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.56%

-0.12%

-6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-10.70%

-5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

2.14%

+6.16%

Volatility

ROBT vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.80%. This indicates that ROBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBT^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

3.80%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.36%

10.20%

+9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.00%

12.86%

+12.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.59%

17.02%

+8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

18.08%

+7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBT and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBT has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to ^GSPC (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBT and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer