ROBO vs. VPN
ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and VPN (Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while VPN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBO returned 6.67%/yr vs 14.89%/yr for VPN. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPN.
Performance
ROBO vs. VPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 24.08% return, which is significantly lower than VPN's 51.28% return.
ROBO
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 6M
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 53.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
VPN
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 51.28%
- 6M
- 54.75%
- 1Y
- 78.03%
- 3Y*
- 34.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO vs. VPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 24.08% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 26.71% |
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 51.28% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 20.35% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and VPN is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between ROBO and VPN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROBO vs. VPN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROBO
VPN
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
ROBO
VPN
-
Technology
ROBO
VPN
Healthcare
ROBO
VPN
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROBO
VPN
-
Financial Services
ROBO
VPN
Communication Services
ROBO
VPN
Consumer Defensive
ROBO
VPN
-
Basic Materials
ROBO
-
VPN
-
Energy
ROBO
-
VPN
-
Real Estate
ROBO
-
VPN
Utilities
ROBO
-
VPN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. VPN — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
VPN
ROBO vs. VPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBO | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.54 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 6.05 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.31 | 18.62 | -7.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. VPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, which is greater than VPN's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and VPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -38.98% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -12.89% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.92% | -24.96% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -38.98% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -1.57% | -3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -12.29% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 4.18% | +0.41% |
Volatility
ROBO vs. VPN - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) at 9.23%. This indicates that ROBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.88% | 9.23% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | 18.31% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.67% | 22.99% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 22.09% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 22.07% | +1.25% |
ROBO vs. VPN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VPN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBO vs. VPN - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VPN's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.73% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBO and VPN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBO has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to VPN (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs VPN's -38.98%.
On 5-year performance, VPN leads with 14.89% vs 6.67% for ROBO. On fees, VPN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VPN has been the lower-risk option at 9.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VPN has performed better with a 14.89% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
VPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.34% for ROBO.
ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while VPN is Technology Equities. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.50% for VPN.
VPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBO and VPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer