ROBO vs. PBOT
ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Robotics funds. ROBO is passively managed, while PBOT is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.
Performance
ROBO vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly lower than PBOT's 27.77% return.
ROBO
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- 33.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
PBOT
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 22.14%
- YTD
- 27.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 16.23% | 2.94% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 27.77% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and PBOT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROBO vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBO | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and PBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -15.78% | -27.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -5.10% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -4.29% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | — | — |
Volatility
ROBO vs. PBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.10% | 26.93% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 26.93% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 26.93% | -3.53% |
ROBO vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBO vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than PBOT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBO and PBOT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.07% for PBOT.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.70% for PBOT.
Find the right allocation for ROBO and PBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer