ROBO vs. CSCO
ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) is Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while CSCO (Cisco Systems, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ROBO returned 13.12%/yr vs 18.92%/yr for CSCO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ROBO vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's 58.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBO has underperformed CSCO with an annualized return of 13.12%, while CSCO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.
ROBO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 47.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
CSCO
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 58.91%
- 6M
- 57.34%
- 1Y
- 93.30%
- 3Y*
- 37.33%
- 5Y*
- 20.60%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
ROBO vs. CSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 19.75% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 45.26% | 29.51% | -20.92% | 44.26% |
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 58.91% | 33.47% | 21.00% | 9.30% | -22.46% | 45.76% | -3.49% | 13.81% | 16.57% | 31.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and CSCO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ROBO and CSCO has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. CSCO — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
CSCO
ROBO vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBO | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.53 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 6.69 | -4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.88 | 18.37 | -8.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, smaller than the maximum CSCO drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and CSCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -89.26% | +45.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -13.57% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.92% | -20.16% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -36.68% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | -41.95% | -1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -6.85% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -40.11% | +27.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 4.93% | -0.40% |
Volatility
ROBO vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 10.66%, while Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 17.31% | -6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.92% | 27.29% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.56% | 30.93% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 24.88% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 25.89% | -2.59% |
Dividends
ROBO vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than CSCO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1.36% | 2.12% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBO and CSCO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSCO has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to ROBO (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs CSCO's -89.26%.
CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBO and CSCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer