PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBO.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO.L achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ.L's -6.43% return.


ROBO.L

1D
-2.84%
1M
-9.06%
6M
4.80%
YTD
11.97%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
12.22%

BOTZ.L

1D
-3.88%
1M
-10.08%
6M
-11.14%
YTD
-6.43%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ROBO.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.97%23.22%-1.60%25.20%-33.80%-1.32%
BOTZ.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
-6.43%13.45%13.02%40.20%-42.86%-5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO.L and BOTZ.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.91

The correlation between ROBO.L and BOTZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO.L
ROBO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ROBO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ.L
BOTZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBO.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBO.LBOTZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.04

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

0.19

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

0.50

+4.83

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO.L and BOTZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO.L drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ.L drawdown of -53.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO.L and BOTZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBO.LBOTZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.74%

-53.16%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-17.87%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.70%

-29.07%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.75%

-17.30%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-23.05%

+9.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

6.66%

-1.65%

Volatility

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBO.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) have volatilities of 9.88% and 9.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBO.LBOTZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

9.62%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.22%

21.16%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.36%

26.30%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.21%

26.51%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

26.51%

-4.06%

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBO.L vs. BOTZ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROBO.L nor BOTZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, ROBO.L and BOTZ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BOTZ.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOTZ.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBO.L.

ROBO.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS Index, while BOTZ.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBO.L and 0.50% for BOTZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO.L and BOTZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer