ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L
ROBO.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) and AUCO.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while AUCO.L is a Gold fund tracking the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROBO.L returned 12.58%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for AUCO.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROBO.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AUCO.L.
Performance
ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO.L achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than AUCO.L's -14.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROBO.L having a 12.58% annualized return and AUCO.L not far behind at 11.99%.
ROBO.L
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 33.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
AUCO.L
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -14.48%
- 6M
- -23.42%
- YTD
- -14.70%
- 1Y
- 48.05%
- 3Y*
- 41.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 15.43% | 23.22% | -1.60% | 25.20% | -33.80% | 15.65% | 45.75% | 29.35% | -21.17% | 46.40% |
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -14.70% | 181.83% | 17.96% | 15.02% | -14.30% | -10.12% | 21.72% | 44.14% | -10.42% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO.L and AUCO.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, ROBO.L and AUCO.L have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO.L
AUCO.L
ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBO.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.27 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 2.97 | +3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO.L drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, smaller than the maximum AUCO.L drawdown of -78.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO.L and AUCO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.74% | -78.30% | +35.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -37.60% | +21.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -37.60% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.74% | -48.62% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | -54.47% | +11.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -36.38% | +25.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.17% | -40.73% | +27.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 16.11% | -11.17% |
Volatility
ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.L) is 9.56%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that ROBO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 16.05% | -6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 39.39% | -17.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 48.92% | -22.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 38.99% | -14.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 35.75% | -13.32% |
ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than AUCO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBO.L vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROBO.L nor AUCO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBO.L and AUCO.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUCO.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUCO.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBO.L.
ROBO.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while AUCO.L is Gold. ROBO.L tracks L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while AUCO.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBO.L and 0.55% for AUCO.L.
Find the right allocation for ROBO.L and AUCO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer