ROBN vs. TSLZ
ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBN is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ROBN returned -29.65% vs -64.19% for TSLZ. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
ROBN vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -60.08% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -5.69% return.
ROBN
- 1D
- -12.05%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- YTD
- -60.08%
- 6M
- -72.54%
- 1Y
- -29.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -5.69%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- 1Y
- -64.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBN vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | -60.08% | 134.27% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.69% | -74.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBN and TSLZ is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBN vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
ROBN
TSLZ
ROBN vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBN | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.90 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | -0.84 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | -1.06 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBN | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | -0.70 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | -0.67 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
ROBN vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBN | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.84% | -99.11% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.84% | -76.62% | -10.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.36% | -99.01% | +17.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -75.36% | +32.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.11% | 60.60% | -7.49% |
Volatility
ROBN vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a higher volatility of 41.47% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 24.09%. This indicates that ROBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBN | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.47% | 24.09% | +17.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.22% | 54.94% | +46.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.84% | 91.64% | +46.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.35% | 117.04% | +35.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 152.35% | 117.04% | +35.31% |
ROBN vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ROBN and TSLZ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
ROBN vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than TSLZ's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | 11.22% | 4.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBN and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBN has higher volatility (41.47%) compared to TSLZ (24.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBN dropped -86.84% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, ROBN leads with -29.65% vs -64.19% for TSLZ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 24.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ROBN has performed better with a -29.65% return vs -64.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROBN and TSLZ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 0.73% for TSLZ.
ROBN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities.
ROBN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBN and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer