PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBN vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBN vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -60.08% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -5.69% return.


ROBN

1D
-12.05%
1M
10.71%
YTD
-60.08%
6M
-72.54%
1Y
-29.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLZ

1D
-0.09%
1M
-17.84%
YTD
-5.69%
6M
-9.62%
1Y
-64.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBN vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ROBN and TSLZ is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025

-0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBN vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBN
ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBN vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBNTSLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.90

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

-0.84

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

-1.06

+0.50

ROBN vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBN Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBN and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBNTSLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

-0.70

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

-0.67

+0.64

Drawdowns

ROBN vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBNTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.84%

-99.11%

+12.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.84%

-76.62%

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.36%

-99.01%

+17.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-75.36%

+32.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.11%

60.60%

-7.49%

Volatility

ROBN vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a higher volatility of 41.47% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 24.09%. This indicates that ROBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBNTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.47%

24.09%

+17.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.22%

54.94%

+46.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.84%

91.64%

+46.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.35%

117.04%

+35.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

152.35%

117.04%

+35.31%

ROBN vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ROBN and TSLZ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Dividends

ROBN vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than TSLZ's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ROBN
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF
11.22%4.48%0.00%0.00%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.73%0.69%2.08%12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBN and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBN has higher volatility (41.47%) compared to TSLZ (24.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBN dropped -86.84% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

On 1-year performance, ROBN leads with -29.65% vs -64.19% for TSLZ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 24.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROBN has performed better with a -29.65% return vs -64.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROBN and TSLZ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 0.73% for TSLZ.

ROBN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities.

ROBN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBN and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer