ROBN vs. MUU
ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ROBN is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROBN charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
ROBN vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROBN
- 1D
- -11.66%
- 1M
- 62.27%
- YTD
- -47.10%
- 6M
- -53.81%
- 1Y
- -26.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBN vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | -3.50% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBN and MUU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBN vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
ROBN
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROBN vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBN | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBN vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBN | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.84% | -26.63% | -60.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.30% | -26.63% | -48.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.41% | -12.91% | -31.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.05% | — | — |
Volatility
ROBN vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBN | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.51% | 263.57% | -123.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.07% | 263.57% | -111.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 152.07% | 263.57% | -111.50% |
ROBN vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBN vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than MUU's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.23% | 0.00% |
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | 8.47% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBN and MUU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.
ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 8.47%, compared with 0.23% for MUU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for ROBN and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer