ROBN vs. COMT
ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBN is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. ROBN is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. Over the past year, ROBN returned -29.71% vs 34.22% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. ROBN charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
ROBN vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -27.36% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.83% return.
ROBN
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- 32.51%
- 6M
- -34.60%
- YTD
- -27.36%
- 1Y
- -29.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- YTD
- 30.83%
- 1Y
- 34.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
ROBN vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | -27.36% | 124.78% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 30.83% | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBN and COMT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | -0.00 |
The correlation between ROBN and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBN vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
ROBN
COMT
ROBN vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBN | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.28 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 1.96 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 6.60 | -7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBN vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBN | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.84% | -51.89% | -34.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.84% | -17.57% | -69.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.08% | -10.84% | -55.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -23.96% | -21.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.38% | 5.20% | +53.18% |
Volatility
ROBN vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a higher volatility of 37.14% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 6.07%. This indicates that ROBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBN | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.14% | 6.07% | +31.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.20% | 19.67% | +85.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.91% | 21.53% | +117.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.94% | 21.20% | +129.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.94% | 18.85% | +132.09% |
ROBN vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBN vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than COMT's 5.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.92% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | 6.17% | 4.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBN and COMT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBN has higher volatility (37.14%) compared to COMT (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBN dropped -86.84% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 34.22% vs -29.71% for ROBN. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 34.22% return vs -29.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.
ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 5.92% for COMT.
ROBN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBN and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer