ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ROBG.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) and BOTG.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Robotics funds - ROBG.L tracks the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index while BOTG.L tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROBG.L returned 10.22%/yr vs 5.73%/yr for BOTG.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBG.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BOTG.L.

Performance

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ROBG.L is traded in GBp, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBG.L achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's -2.23% return.

ROBG.L

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -6.05%
• 6M: 9.45%
• YTD: 15.94%
• 1Y: 33.01%
• 3Y*: 10.22%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: 12.45%

BOTG.L

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -6.20%
• 6M: -5.88%
• YTD: -2.23%
• 1Y: 9.83%
• 3Y*: 5.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	15.94%	14.68%	-0.04%	18.36%	-25.90%	-1.70%
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	-2.23%	5.46%	15.00%	32.59%	-36.01%	-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBG.L and BOTG.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.85

The correlation between ROBG.L and BOTG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROBG.L	BOTG.L
Technology	45.6%	41.2%
Industrials	45.4%	48.1%
Healthcare	4.6%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	0.7%
Communication Services	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBG.L

ROBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ROBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ROBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ROBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ROBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BOTG.L

BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBG.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	0.37	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	0.73	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.09	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	0.56	+1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.55	1.36	+6.19

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBG.L and BOTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBG.L drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, smaller than the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -57.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBG.L and BOTG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBG.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.34%	-57.90%	+12.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.72%	-17.52%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.14%	-30.92%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.84%	-29.57%	+18.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.66%	-39.19%	+24.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	7.22%	-2.86%

Volatility

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) at 9.47%. This indicates that ROBG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBG.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.15%	9.47%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.64%	21.90%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.77%	26.56%	-2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.96%	29.84%	-4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.52%	29.84%	-7.32%

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBG.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBG.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

ROBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.33%	0.27%	0.24%	0.08%
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBG.L and BOTG.L in my portfolio?

ROBG.L and BOTG.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROBG.L or BOTG.L?

On fees, BOTG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBG.L or BOTG.L?

BOTG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBG.L.

What is the main difference between ROBG.L and BOTG.L?

ROBG.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, while BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBG.L and 0.50% for BOTG.L.