ROBG.L vs. BOTZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ).

ROBG.L and BOTZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROBG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 23, 2014. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. Both ROBG.L and BOTZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	3.27%	14.68%	-0.04%	18.36%	-25.90%	17.05%	40.88%	25.34%	-16.64%	33.32%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	-4.89%	6.03%	14.22%	32.02%	-35.88%	9.68%	47.46%	26.79%	-24.09%	44.35%

Different Trading Currencies

ROBG.L is traded in GBp, while BOTZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BOTZ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBG.L achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -4.89% return.

ROBG.L

• 1D: 4.88%
• 1M: -7.88%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 34.30%
• 3Y*: 6.88%
• 5Y*: 2.95%
• 10Y*: 12.46%

BOTZ

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -10.23%
• YTD: -4.89%
• 6M: -3.05%
• 1Y: 16.22%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 1.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBG.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

ROBG.L

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF

BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

Return for Risk

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBG.L

ROBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ROBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ROBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ROBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ROBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 38
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROBG.L	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	0.60	+0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.07	+1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.14	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	0.98	+1.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.34	3.05	+6.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBG.L and BOTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROBG.L	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	0.60	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.04	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.39	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ROBG.L and BOTZ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

ROBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.70%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%

Drawdowns

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBG.L and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBG.L	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.50%	-55.54%	+21.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.77%	-19.34%	+5.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.50%	-55.54%	+21.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.20%	-14.52%	+5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.45%	-18.56%	+8.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	5.37%	-1.79%

Volatility

ROBG.L vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.54%. This indicates that ROBG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBG.L	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.73%	7.54%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.39%	16.84%	-1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.76%	26.99%	-4.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.21%	24.27%	-4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	24.59%	-4.62%