ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L
ROBE.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BOTG.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Robotics funds - ROBE.L tracks the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS Index while BOTG.L tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROBE.L returned 8.76%/yr vs 4.23%/yr for BOTG.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBE.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BOTG.L.
Performance
ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ROBE.L is traded in EUR, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBE.L achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's -3.90% return.
ROBE.L
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 28.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
BOTG.L
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -8.62%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBE.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.99% | 9.14% | 4.79% | 20.61% | -29.75% | -0.54% |
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing | -3.90% | -0.04% | 20.55% | 35.40% | -39.31% | -29.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBE.L and BOTG.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ROBE.L and BOTG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROBE.L
BOTG.L
ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBE.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBE.L | BOTG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.23 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | 0.62 | +5.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, smaller than the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -59.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBE.L and BOTG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBE.L | BOTG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -59.26% | +23.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -19.17% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.61% | -31.85% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.38% | -33.26% | +20.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -40.24% | +28.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 7.18% | -2.86% |
Volatility
ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBE.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) have volatilities of 10.13% and 10.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBE.L | BOTG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 10.04% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.06% | 22.39% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 27.34% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 30.31% | -7.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 30.31% | -8.86% |
ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBE.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBE.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison
ROBE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.24% | 0.08% |
ROBE.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBE.L and BOTG.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BOTG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BOTG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBE.L.
ROBE.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS Index, while BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBE.L and 0.50% for BOTG.L.
Find the right allocation for ROBE.L and BOTG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer