ROBE.L vs. COMF.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ROBE.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and COMF.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBE.L is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS Index, while COMF.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROBE.L returned 12.20%/yr vs 7.80%/yr for COMF.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROBE.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for COMF.L.

Performance

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBE.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ROBE.L is traded in EUR, while COMF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COMF.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ROBE.L having a 18.33% return and COMF.L slightly lower at 18.08%. Over the past 10 years, ROBE.L has outperformed COMF.L with an annualized return of 12.20%, while COMF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.80% annualized return.

ROBE.L

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -4.30%
• 6M: 9.07%
• YTD: 18.33%
• 1Y: 36.18%
• 3Y*: 10.35%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 12.20%

COMF.L

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.42%
• 6M: 12.80%
• YTD: 18.08%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: 10.71%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: 7.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROBE.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	18.33%	9.14%	4.79%	20.61%	-29.75%	25.18%	33.46%	31.56%	-17.23%	28.95%
COMF.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF	18.08%	2.62%	12.07%	-9.18%	26.09%	42.90%	-5.93%	9.79%	-4.13%	-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBE.L and COMF.L is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014	0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between ROBE.L and COMF.L has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBE.L

ROBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ROBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ROBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ROBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ROBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

COMF.L

COMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
COMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
COMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
COMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBE.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBE.L	COMF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.76	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.36	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.31	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	2.59	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	7.89	+0.60

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the COMF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBE.L and COMF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, smaller than the maximum COMF.L drawdown of -47.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBE.L and COMF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBE.L	COMF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.18%	-47.32%	+11.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.69%	-9.99%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.61%	-14.56%	-17.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.18%	-23.23%	-12.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.18%	-27.02%	-9.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.82%	-5.40%	-4.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.59%	-21.41%	+9.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	3.28%	+0.97%

Volatility

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBE.L) has a higher volatility of 9.93% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) at 3.62%. This indicates that ROBE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBE.L	COMF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.93%	3.62%	+6.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.85%	12.13%	+7.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.31%	14.73%	+9.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.35%	15.57%	+6.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.43%	14.08%	+7.35%

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBE.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than COMF.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBE.L vs. COMF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROBE.L nor COMF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBE.L and COMF.L in my portfolio?

ROBE.L and COMF.L have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROBE.L or COMF.L?

On fees, COMF.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBE.L or COMF.L?

COMF.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBE.L.

What is the main difference between ROBE.L and COMF.L?

ROBE.L is categorized as Robotics, while COMF.L is Commodities. ROBE.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS Index, while COMF.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBE.L and 0.30% for COMF.L.