PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROAM vs. TJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROAM vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAM achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 1.65% return.


ROAM

1D
-3.55%
1M
3.25%
YTD
24.58%
6M
25.40%
1Y
44.77%
3Y*
25.04%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
9.33%

TJUN

1D
-3.88%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.01%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROAM vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ROAM and TJUN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.78

The correlation between ROAM and TJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROAM vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAM
ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

TJUN
TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROAM vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROAMTJUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.37

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

3.04

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.16

13.10

+3.05

ROAM vs. TJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the TJUN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAM and TJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROAM vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and TJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROAMTJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.47%

-4.47%

-41.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-4.47%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-3.88%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.09%

-0.58%

-10.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.04%

+1.74%

Volatility

ROAM vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) at 4.01%. This indicates that ROAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROAMTJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

4.01%

+5.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

6.42%

+8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

8.33%

+8.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

8.33%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

8.33%

+9.62%

ROAM vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROAM vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.55%3.17%4.15%5.40%5.23%4.22%3.04%3.55%2.54%1.84%1.89%2.25%
TJUN
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROAM and TJUN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROAM has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to TJUN (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAM dropped -45.47% vs TJUN's -4.47%.

On 1-year performance, ROAM leads with 44.77% vs 13.53% for TJUN. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TJUN has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 44.77% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

ROAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

ROAM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for ROAM and 0.95% for TJUN.

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROAM and TJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer