ROAM vs. BAMU
ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROAM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. ROAM is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, ROAM returned 44.77% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. ROAM charges 0.44%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.
Performance
ROAM vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROAM achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.
ROAM
- 1D
- -3.55%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 24.58%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 44.77%
- 3Y*
- 25.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
BAMU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROAM vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 24.58% | 32.08% | 6.21% | 10.79% |
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.18% | 3.21% | 4.14% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROAM and BAMU is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROAM vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank
ROAM
BAMU
ROAM vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROAM | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 2.41 | -0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 24.37 | -19.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.16 | 96.52 | -80.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROAM vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and BAMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROAM | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.47% | -0.36% | -45.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -0.12% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | 0.00% | -3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -0.02% | -11.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 0.03% | +2.75% |
Volatility
ROAM vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that ROAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROAM | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 0.09% | +9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 0.39% | +14.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 0.58% | +16.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 0.87% | +14.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 0.87% | +17.08% |
ROAM vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROAM vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison
ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 3.05% | 3.20% | 3.97% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.55% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROAM and BAMU have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROAM has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAM dropped -45.47% vs BAMU's -0.36%.
On 1-year performance, ROAM leads with 44.77% vs 2.87% for BAMU. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 44.77% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 2.55% for ROAM.
ROAM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for ROAM and 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROAM and BAMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer