RNWZ vs. VEA

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNWZ is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. RNWZ is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RNWZ returned 11.78%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for VEA. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RNWZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.

Performance

RNWZ vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RNWZ having a 15.40% return and VEA slightly lower at 14.73%.

RNWZ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 15.40%
• 6M: 17.62%
• 1Y: 34.43%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VEA

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 3.58%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 6M: 16.65%
• 1Y: 31.41%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNWZ vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	15.40%	36.33%	-7.36%	-3.89%	-0.74%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	14.73%	35.16%	3.15%	17.93%	-1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RNWZ and VEA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2022	0.62

The correlation between RNWZ and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

RNWZ vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNWZ	VEA
Utilities	40.6%	3.3%
Financial Services	6.3%	23.3%
Industrials	5.3%	19.2%
Basic Materials	4.8%	7.5%
Energy	3.9%	5.4%
Real Estate	3.2%	2.7%
Communication Services	-	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.6%
Healthcare	-	8.2%
Technology	-	13.8%

Return for Risk

RNWZ vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNWZ

RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 80
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

VEA

VEA Risk / Return Rank: 62
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNWZ vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNWZ	VEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.81	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.50	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.33	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	2.58	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.90	9.92	+2.99

RNWZ vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNWZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNWZ and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNWZ vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNWZ drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWZ and VEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNWZ	VEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.90%	-60.68%	+35.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.07%	-11.63%	+4.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.74%	-13.45%	-11.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.19%	-1.06%	-4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-13.28%	+6.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	3.02%	-0.39%

Volatility

RNWZ vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) is 5.01%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that RNWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNWZ	VEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	6.84%	-1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	14.38%	-2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	16.58%	-1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	16.72%	+0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	17.40%	-0.42%

RNWZ vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNWZ vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

RNWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	1.94%	2.12%	2.36%	3.87%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	2.62%	3.22%	3.35%	3.15%	2.91%	3.16%	2.04%	3.04%	3.35%	2.77%	3.05%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNWZ and VEA in my portfolio?

RNWZ and VEA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNWZ or VEA?

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to RNWZ (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNWZ dropped -24.90% vs VEA's -60.68%.

Which ETF is better, RNWZ or VEA?

On 3-year performance, VEA leads with 19.03% vs 11.78% for RNWZ. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RNWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNWZ or VEA?

Over the 3-year period, VEA has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNWZ or VEA?

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNWZ or VEA?

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.94% for RNWZ.

What is the main difference between RNWZ and VEA?

RNWZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNWZ and 0.03% for VEA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.