PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNWGX vs. MIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNWGX vs. MIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNWGX achieves a 17.60% return, which is significantly higher than MIN's -2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RNWGX has outperformed MIN with an annualized return of 11.44%, while MIN has yielded a comparatively lower 2.76% annualized return.


RNWGX

1D
0.70%
1M
6.76%
YTD
17.60%
6M
19.34%
1Y
36.77%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
11.44%

MIN

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
-2.92%
6M
-3.68%
1Y
-0.69%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
2.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNWGX vs. MIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
17.60%28.67%6.88%16.26%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.03%-12.00%33.07%
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
-2.92%6.92%8.59%6.33%-15.68%2.79%9.71%13.42%-2.99%2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RNWGX and MIN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNWGX vs. MIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNWGX
RNWGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RNWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MIN
MIN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNWGX vs. MIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNWGXMINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.00

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

-0.11

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

-0.28

+11.99

RNWGX vs. MIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNWGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the MIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNWGX and MIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNWGXMINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

-0.07

+2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.05

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.27

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.18

+0.35

Drawdowns

RNWGX vs. MIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNWGX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than MIN's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWGX and MIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNWGXMINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-31.15%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-6.20%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-7.77%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-19.31%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.40%

-19.31%

-14.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.75%

+4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-8.85%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.49%

+0.67%

Volatility

RNWGX vs. MIN - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) at 3.22%. This indicates that RNWGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNWGXMINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

3.22%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

8.80%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

10.60%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

11.17%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

10.42%

+5.72%

Dividends

RNWGX vs. MIN - Dividend Comparison

RNWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than MIN's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
9.28%8.78%9.11%9.36%10.04%8.97%8.90%9.04%9.70%9.37%9.39%9.71%
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
5.18%6.09%4.11%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.44%4.05%2.71%2.26%1.37%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNWGX and MIN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNWGX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to MIN (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNWGX dropped -33.40% vs MIN's -31.15%.

RNWGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNWGX and MIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer