RNTY vs. COSW
RNTY (YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF) and COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
RNTY vs. COSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 12.13% return.
RNTY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COSW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNTY vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF | 6.19% | -0.69% |
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 12.13% | -10.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNTY and COSW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNTY vs. COSW — Risk / Return Rank
RNTY
COSW
RNTY vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNTY | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNTY | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.01 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
RNTY vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum COSW drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and COSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNTY | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -16.24% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -14.62% | +12.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -4.17% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | — | — |
Volatility
RNTY vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNTY | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.61% | 26.10% | -15.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 26.10% | -15.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 26.10% | -15.35% |
RNTY vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RNTY and COSW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
RNTY vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison
RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, less than COSW's 18.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 18.13% | 4.96% |
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF | 13.30% | 8.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNTY and COSW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RNTY and COSW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 13.30% for RNTY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for RNTY and COSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer