RNTY vs. COSW

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RNTY (YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF) and COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

RNTY vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 11.78% return.

RNTY

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 8.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COSW

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -8.28%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	8.36%	-0.76%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	11.78%	-10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and COSW is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

RNTY vs. COSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY

RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 23
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 21
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 27

COSW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNTY	COSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.45	—	—

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum COSW drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and COSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNTY	COSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-16.24%	+8.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-14.89%	+14.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-4.94%	+3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RNTY	COSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.97%	25.46%	-14.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.87%	25.46%	-14.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.87%	25.46%	-14.59%

RNTY vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RNTY and COSW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

RNTY vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, less than COSW's 19.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	19.61%	4.96%
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	12.00%	8.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNTY and COSW in my portfolio?

RNTY and COSW have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RNTY or COSW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNTY or COSW?

RNTY and COSW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNTY or COSW?

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 19.61%, compared with 12.00% for RNTY.

What is the main difference between RNTY and COSW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.