PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNTY vs. ULTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNTY vs. ULTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than ULTY's 12.54% return.


RNTY

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.87%
1Y
6.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ULTY

1D
0.98%
1M
6.02%
YTD
12.54%
6M
12.64%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. ULTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and ULTY is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNTY vs. ULTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY
RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ULTY
ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. ULTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNTYULTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

0.53

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

0.83

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.46

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

0.91

+2.09

RNTY vs. ULTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the ULTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and ULTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNTYULTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.53

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.20

+0.61

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. ULTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum ULTY drawdown of -26.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and ULTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNTYULTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-26.85%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-24.16%

+16.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-7.72%

+4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-9.37%

+7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

12.30%

-9.94%

Volatility

RNTY vs. ULTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is 2.75%, while YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that RNTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNTYULTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

4.24%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

15.09%

-7.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.59%

20.75%

-10.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.74%

26.93%

-16.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.74%

26.93%

-16.19%

RNTY vs. ULTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ULTY's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNTY vs. ULTY - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.26%, less than ULTY's 110.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
RNTY
YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF
12.26%8.28%0.00%
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
110.59%142.99%111.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNTY and ULTY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULTY has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to RNTY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs ULTY's -26.85%.

On 1-year performance, ULTY leads with 11.03% vs 6.89% for RNTY. On fees, RNTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RNTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ULTY has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RNTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 110.59%, compared with 12.26% for RNTY.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RNTY and 1.14% for ULTY.

RNTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNTY and ULTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer