RNTY vs. BNO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RNTY (YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - RNTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. RNTY is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, RNTY returned 11.55% vs 62.83% for BNO. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RNTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

RNTY vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.

RNTY

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 6.14%
• YTD: 8.70%
• 1Y: 11.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.48%

BNO

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 27.00%
• 6M: 52.90%
• YTD: 77.90%
• 1Y: 62.83%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 20.89%
• 10Y*: 15.06%
• ALL TIME*: 4.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	$107.13M	$97.34M	$147.52M
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	$221.40K	$150.11K	$107.13K

RNTY vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	8.70%	4.58%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	77.90%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and BNO is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

RNTY vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNTY

RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 41
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 38
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 52
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNTY vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNTY	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.32	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	1.90	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.24	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	1.70	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.27	5.15	+0.12

RNTY vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNTY	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-87.06%	+79.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-34.46%	+26.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-16.21%	+14.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-39.99%	+38.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	11.86%	-9.74%

Volatility

RNTY vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is 3.03%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that RNTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNTY	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	17.47%	-14.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.23%	40.96%	-32.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.95%	44.54%	-33.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.82%	36.41%	-25.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.82%	36.98%	-26.16%

RNTY vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNTY vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.05%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	12.05%	8.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNTY and BNO in my portfolio?

RNTY and BNO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNTY or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to RNTY (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, RNTY or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 62.83% vs 11.55% for RNTY. On fees, RNTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RNTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNTY or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 62.83% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNTY or BNO?

RNTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNTY or BNO?

RNTY has the higher dividend yield at 12.05%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between RNTY and BNO?

RNTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RNTY and 1.00% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.