RNRG vs. URA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RNRG (Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNRG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RNRG returned 4.47%/yr vs 17.12%/yr for URA. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RNRG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

RNRG vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RNRG having a 17.66% return and URA slightly higher at 17.93%. Over the past 10 years, RNRG has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 4.47%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.12% annualized return.

RNRG

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 17.51%
• 1Y: 42.65%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: -2.70%
• 10Y*: 4.47%

URA

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 61.26%
• 3Y*: 39.27%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNRG vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	17.66%	29.61%	-22.00%	-12.82%	-15.30%	-12.78%	26.67%	37.04%	-6.22%	21.16%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	17.93%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and URA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	0.42

The correlation between RNRG and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNRG vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNRG	URA
Utilities	92.8%	9.4%
Industrials	3.0%	21.9%
Technology	2.2%	0.9%
Basic Materials	2.1%	5.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	57.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RNRG vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRG

RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 84
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 34
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNRG vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNRG	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	1.23	+1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	1.86	+1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.22	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.20	2.17	+5.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.98	4.58	+15.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNRG vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNRG Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRG and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNRG	URA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	1.23	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.49	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.46	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	-0.05	+0.12

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNRG	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	-93.54%	+34.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	-28.43%	+22.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.23%	-37.81%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.17%	-37.90%	-14.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.79%	-61.45%	+2.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.37%	-42.81%	+12.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	-75.01%	+50.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	13.40%	-11.26%

Volatility

RNRG vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 5.55%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 15.94%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNRG	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	15.94%	-10.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	38.29%	-26.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	50.19%	-34.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.10%	43.62%	-23.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.67%	37.73%	-18.06%

RNRG vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNRG vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than URA's 4.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	1.28%	1.50%	1.48%	1.44%	1.15%	1.10%	3.16%	2.97%	5.22%	4.14%	5.02%	3.48%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.14%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNRG and URA in my portfolio?

RNRG and URA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNRG or URA?

URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to RNRG (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNRG dropped -58.79% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which ETF is better, RNRG or URA?

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 17.12% vs 4.47% for RNRG. On fees, RNRG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RNRG has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNRG or URA?

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 17.12% return vs 4.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNRG or URA?

RNRG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNRG or URA?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 1.28% for RNRG.

What is the main difference between RNRG and URA?

RNRG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RNRG and 0.69% for URA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.