RNRG vs. LCTD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD).
RNRG and LCTD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RNRG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index. It was launched on May 28, 2015. LCTD is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2021.
Performance
RNRG vs. LCTD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RNRG vs. LCTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF | 11.62% | 29.61% | -22.00% | -12.82% | -15.30% | -0.79% |
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 2.78% | 30.42% | 3.14% | 17.10% | -16.16% | 4.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNRG achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than LCTD's 2.78% return.
RNRG
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 47.91%
- 3Y*
- 1.37%
- 5Y*
- -3.90%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
LCTD
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RNRG vs. LCTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTD's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RNRG vs. LCTD — Risk / Return Rank
RNRG
LCTD
RNRG vs. LCTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNRG | LCTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.66 | 1.51 | +1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 2.10 | +1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.33 | 2.41 | +2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.94 | 9.04 | +13.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNRG | LCTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 1.51 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.45 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between RNRG and LCTD is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RNRG vs. LCTD - Dividend Comparison
RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than LCTD's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.10% | 3.16% | 2.97% | 5.22% | 4.14% | 5.02% | 3.48% |
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 3.51% | 3.61% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RNRG vs. LCTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than LCTD's maximum drawdown of -29.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and LCTD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNRG | LCTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.79% | -29.82% | -28.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -10.92% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.95% | -6.46% | -27.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -6.91% | -17.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.91% | -0.60% |
Volatility
RNRG vs. LCTD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 6.29%, while BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RNRG | LCTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 7.20% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 11.09% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 17.12% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 16.03% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 16.03% | +3.59% |