PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNRG vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNRG vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRG achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 24.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RNRG has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 4.25%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 20.66% annualized return.


RNRG

1D
0.17%
1M
-6.97%
YTD
8.52%
6M
8.55%
1Y
27.31%
3Y*
1.81%
5Y*
-4.67%
10Y*
4.25%

GRID

1D
1.52%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
24.91%
6M
23.50%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
24.52%
5Y*
16.82%
10Y*
20.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNRG vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNRG
Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
8.52%29.61%-22.00%-12.82%-15.30%-12.78%26.67%37.04%-6.22%21.16%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
24.91%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and GRID is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.53

The correlation between RNRG and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNRG vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNRG
GRID

Utilities

92.2%
3.9%

Industrials

3.0%
24.2%

Technology

2.8%
12.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

RNRG
92.2%
GRID
3.9%

Industrials

RNRG
3.0%
GRID
24.2%

Technology

RNRG
2.8%
GRID
12.5%

Basic Materials

RNRG
2.0%
GRID
0.0%

Communication Services

RNRG

-

GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

RNRG

-

GRID
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

RNRG

-

GRID

-

Energy

RNRG

-

GRID
1.6%

Financial Services

RNRG

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

RNRG

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

RNRG

-

GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNRG vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRG
RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNRG vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNRGGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.60

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

12.67

-2.47

RNRG vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRG and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNRGGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.79%

-40.56%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-11.73%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.23%

-20.77%

-14.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.17%

-29.64%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.79%

-40.56%

-18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.79%

-4.40%

-31.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.49%

-8.41%

-16.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.32%

-0.63%

Volatility

RNRG vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 5.24%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 9.91%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNRGGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

9.91%

-4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

18.26%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

21.22%

-5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.16%

21.37%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

22.79%

-3.16%

RNRG vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNRG vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than GRID's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
1.19%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
RNRG
Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
1.39%1.50%1.48%1.44%1.15%1.10%3.16%2.97%5.22%4.14%5.02%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNRG and GRID have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (9.91%) compared to RNRG (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNRG dropped -58.79% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 20.66% vs 4.25% for RNRG. On fees, RNRG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RNRG has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 20.66% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RNRG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

RNRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.19% for GRID.

RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RNRG and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNRG and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer