RNRG vs. ECLN

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RNRG (Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF) and ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNRG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while ECLN is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. RNRG is passively managed, while ECLN is actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RNRG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ECLN.

Performance

RNRG vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RNRG

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -2.24%
• 6M: -4.13%
• YTD: 4.37%
• 1Y: 17.54%
• 3Y*: 1.31%
• 5Y*: -5.57%
• 10Y*: 2.43%
• ALL TIME*: 0.26%

ECLN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	$66.75K	$257.91K	$323.94K

RNRG vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	4.37%	29.61%	-22.00%	-12.82%	-15.30%	-12.78%	26.67%	13.67%
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	12.96%	16.78%	22.60%	-3.36%	5.28%	12.26%	8.98%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and ECLN is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between RNRG and ECLN has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RNRG vs. ECLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNRG	ECLN
Utilities	92.8%	56.7%
Industrials	3.0%	8.3%
Technology	2.5%	1.7%
Basic Materials	1.7%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	13.3%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RNRG vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNRG

RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 36
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

ECLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNRG vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNRG	ECLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RNRG	ECLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.24%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.61%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RNRG	ECLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.15%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.58%	—	—

RNRG vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNRG vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	1.43%	1.97%	2.52%	2.54%	1.72%	1.66%	1.68%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	1.70%	1.50%	1.48%	1.44%	1.15%	1.10%	3.16%	2.97%	5.22%	4.14%	5.02%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNRG and ECLN in my portfolio?

RNRG and ECLN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RNRG or ECLN?

On fees, RNRG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNRG or ECLN?

RNRG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNRG or ECLN?

RNRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.43% for ECLN.

What is the main difference between RNRG and ECLN?

RNRG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while ECLN is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RNRG and 0.97% for ECLN.