RNRG vs. BOTZ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RNRG (Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNRG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while BOTZ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RNRG returned -5.57%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for BOTZ. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RNRG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRG achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 2.42% return.

RNRG

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -2.24%
• 6M: -4.13%
• YTD: 4.37%
• 1Y: 17.54%
• 3Y*: 1.31%
• 5Y*: -5.57%
• 10Y*: 2.43%
• ALL TIME*: 0.26%

BOTZ

• 1D: 3.23%
• 1M: -0.80%
• 6M: 0.62%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 1Y: 9.71%
• 3Y*: 10.77%
• 5Y*: 1.54%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	$30.70M	$30.05M	$37.12M
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	$66.75K	$257.91K	$323.94K

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	4.37%	29.61%	-22.00%	-12.82%	-15.30%	-12.78%	26.67%	37.04%	-6.22%	21.16%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	2.42%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	51.92%	31.80%	-28.34%	58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and BOTZ is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016	0.51

The correlation between RNRG and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNRG	BOTZ
Utilities	92.8%	0.0%
Industrials	3.0%	50.8%
Technology	2.5%	30.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	0.0%
Communication Services	-	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	8.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RNRG vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNRG

RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 36
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 18
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNRG	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	0.37	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	0.70	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.08	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	0.50	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	1.27	+2.66

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRG and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNRG	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	-55.54%	-3.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	-19.34%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.62%	-29.02%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.17%	-55.54%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.24%	-10.86%	-27.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.61%	-18.22%	-6.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	7.67%	-3.20%

Volatility

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 4.93%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNRG	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	9.53%	-4.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	21.87%	-9.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.15%	26.60%	-10.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	27.33%	-7.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.58%	25.90%	-6.32%

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNRG vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than BOTZ's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.47%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	1.70%	1.50%	1.48%	1.44%	1.15%	1.10%	3.16%	2.97%	5.22%	4.14%	5.02%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNRG and BOTZ in my portfolio?

RNRG and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNRG or BOTZ?

BOTZ has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to RNRG (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNRG dropped -58.79% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

Which ETF is better, RNRG or BOTZ?

On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 1.54% vs -5.57% for RNRG. On fees, RNRG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RNRG has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNRG or BOTZ?

Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 1.54% return vs -5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNRG or BOTZ?

RNRG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNRG or BOTZ?

RNRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.47% for BOTZ.

What is the main difference between RNRG and BOTZ?

RNRG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BOTZ is Artificial Intelligence. RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RNRG and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.