PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNPGX vs. LVAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNPGX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNPGX achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RNPGX has outperformed LVAFX with an annualized return of 13.83%, while LVAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.11% annualized return.


RNPGX

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.11%
YTD
6.89%
6M
7.82%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
13.83%

LVAFX

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.69%
YTD
13.05%
6M
14.44%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNPGX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNPGX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6
6.89%21.71%17.13%25.06%-25.70%18.00%33.88%31.22%-5.71%29.31%
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
13.05%22.33%0.10%9.81%-4.04%17.36%-5.16%17.54%-6.47%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RNPGX and LVAFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.75

The correlation between RNPGX and LVAFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNPGX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNPGX
RNPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RNPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RNPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAFX
LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNPGX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNPGXLVAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.56

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

4.48

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

17.21

-9.73

RNPGX vs. LVAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the LVAFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNPGX and LVAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNPGXLVAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

3.04

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.62

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.60

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.55

+0.14

Drawdowns

RNPGX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNPGX drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, roughly equal to the maximum LVAFX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNPGX and LVAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNPGXLVAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-33.69%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-5.76%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-17.52%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.25%

-18.34%

-15.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.25%

-33.69%

-0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.39%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-4.75%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.50%

+1.20%

Volatility

RNPGX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 2.05%. This indicates that RNPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNPGXLVAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

2.05%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

6.11%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

8.50%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

13.23%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

13.58%

+4.25%

RNPGX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNPGX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNPGX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison

RNPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than LVAFX's 9.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
9.00%10.17%2.71%15.64%2.90%2.90%2.14%7.62%3.59%7.10%1.66%1.74%
RNPGX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6
6.43%6.87%5.45%5.67%4.53%7.31%4.41%4.47%7.95%5.80%4.20%6.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNPGX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNPGX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to LVAFX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNPGX dropped -34.25% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNPGX and LVAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer