PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNP vs. JNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNP vs. JNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNP achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than JNK's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RNP has outperformed JNK with an annualized return of 8.84%, while JNK has yielded a comparatively lower 5.09% annualized return.


RNP

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.16%
YTD
7.41%
6M
9.84%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
8.84%

JNK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.49%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
5.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNP vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNP
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.
7.41%2.57%11.88%7.73%-19.95%32.84%3.31%43.14%-9.46%19.65%
JNK
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
1.83%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RNP and JNK is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2007

0.49

The correlation between RNP and JNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNP vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNP
RNP Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RNP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RNP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNP vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNPJNKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.35

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

2.85

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

12.52

-12.44

RNP vs. JNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNP Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the JNK Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNP and JNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNP vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNP drawdown since its inception was -86.93%, which is greater than JNK's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNP and JNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNPJNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.93%

-38.48%

-48.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-2.51%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-5.02%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-16.67%

-19.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.68%

-22.89%

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

0.00%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-3.69%

-9.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

0.57%

+4.88%

Volatility

RNP vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) at 1.21%. This indicates that RNP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNPJNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

1.21%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

3.03%

+6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

3.87%

+9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

7.55%

+13.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

8.31%

+15.92%

Dividends

RNP vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison

RNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than JNK's 6.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNK
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
6.60%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%
RNP
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.
7.96%8.22%7.81%8.10%13.26%5.20%6.52%6.25%8.36%7.00%7.75%8.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNP and JNK have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNP has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to JNK (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNP dropped -86.93% vs JNK's -38.48%.

JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNP and JNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer