RNMBY vs. MA
RNMBY (Rheinmetall AG ADR) and MA (Mastercard Incorporated) are both stocks. RNMBY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while MA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RNMBY returned 38.75%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for MA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RNMBY vs. MA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNMBY achieves a -23.17% return, which is significantly lower than MA's -13.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RNMBY has outperformed MA with an annualized return of 38.75%, while MA has yielded a comparatively lower 18.64% annualized return.
RNMBY
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 6.72%
- YTD
- -23.17%
- 6M
- -26.34%
- 1Y
- -32.17%
- 3Y*
- 74.63%
- 5Y*
- 70.20%
- 10Y*
- 38.75%
MA
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -13.89%
- 6M
- -14.05%
- 1Y
- -12.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
RNMBY vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | -23.17% | 190.28% | 99.83% | 63.35% | 122.00% | -13.84% | -2.03% | 28.14% | -29.38% | 98.17% |
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -13.89% | 9.04% | 24.17% | 23.40% | -2.66% | 1.16% | 20.19% | 59.16% | 25.31% | 47.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNMBY and MA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2012 | 0.20 |
The correlation between RNMBY and MA shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RNMBY:
$64.85B
MA:
$437.55B
RNMBY:
€3.56
MA:
$17.28
RNMBY:
67.40
MA:
28.36
RNMBY:
3.08
MA:
1.65
RNMBY:
5.07
MA:
13.01
RNMBY:
10.50
MA:
65.09
RNMBY:
€9.58B
MA:
$33.94B
RNMBY:
€4.12B
MA:
$26.70B
RNMBY:
€1.81B
MA:
$21.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNMBY vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank
RNMBY
MA
RNMBY vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNMBY | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.89 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.79 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -1.59 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNMBY vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNMBY drawdown since its inception was -67.75%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMBY and MA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNMBY | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.75% | -62.67% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.06% | -20.91% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.06% | -20.91% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.06% | -28.25% | -15.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.75% | -41.00% | -26.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.00% | -17.82% | -22.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.73% | -9.82% | -6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.36% | 10.48% | +9.88% |
Volatility
RNMBY vs. MA - Volatility Comparison
Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 6.46%. This indicates that RNMBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNMBY | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 6.46% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.85% | 17.51% | +16.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.65% | 22.34% | +23.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.78% | 24.01% | +20.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.51% | 26.92% | +14.59% |
Dividends
RNMBY vs. MA - Dividend Comparison
RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than MA's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | 0.67% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | 0.98% | 0.49% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.82% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 2.06% | 2.97% | 0.53% |
Financials
RNMBY vs. MA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rheinmetall AG ADR and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RNMBY vs. MA - Profitability Comparison
RNMBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
MA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
RNMBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
MA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.
RNMBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
MA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RNMBY and MA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNMBY has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to MA (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNMBY dropped -67.75% vs MA's -62.67%.
RNMBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNMBY and MA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer