PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNMBF vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNMBF achieves a -25.51% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 19.98% return.


RNMBF

1D
-0.59%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-25.51%
6M
-24.68%
1Y
-31.88%
3Y*
72.30%
5Y*
72.16%
10Y*

RYCEY

1D
0.11%
1M
12.12%
YTD
19.98%
6M
20.21%
1Y
56.29%
3Y*
115.03%
5Y*
65.23%
10Y*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RNMBF
Rheinmetall AG
-25.51%189.47%106.03%62.49%112.89%16.07%8.13%0.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
19.98%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-10.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RNMBF and RYCEY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019

0.18

The correlation between RNMBF and RYCEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNMBF:

$63.10B

RYCEY:

$157.80B

EPS

RNMBF:

€17.07

RYCEY:

£0.99

PE Ratio

RNMBF:

69.32

RYCEY:

14.34

PEG Ratio

RNMBF:

1.88

RYCEY:

0.03

PS Ratio

RNMBF:

5.24

RYCEY:

2.99

PB Ratio

RNMBF:

10.31

RYCEY:

43.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNMBF:

€9.57B

RYCEY:

£40.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNMBF:

€4.39B

RYCEY:

£10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNMBF:

€1.78B

RYCEY:

£8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNMBF vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNMBF
RNMBF Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RNMBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBF Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBF Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNMBFRYCEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.27

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

2.60

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

7.30

-8.82

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNMBF Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNMBF and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNMBF drawdown since its inception was -43.75%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMBF and RYCEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNMBFRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.75%

-99.07%

+55.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.75%

-21.75%

-22.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.75%

-23.37%

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.75%

-62.01%

+18.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.54%

-76.18%

+34.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-84.14%

+75.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.02%

7.73%

+13.29%

Volatility

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 9.62%. This indicates that RNMBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNMBFRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.11%

9.62%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.15%

32.96%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.65%

38.13%

+8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.73%

43.46%

+6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.58%

49.36%

-0.78%

Dividends

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

RNMBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than RYCEY's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNMBF
Rheinmetall AG
1.00%1.48%1.92%2.96%3.43%19.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.68%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Financials

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rheinmetall AG and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
1.95B
11.64B
(RNMBF) Total Revenue
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RNMBF values in EUR, RYCEY values in GBP

RNMBF vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rheinmetall AG and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
21.9%
27.4%
Portfolio components
RNMBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG reported a gross profit of 425.61M and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

RNMBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG reported an operating income of 176.67M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

RNMBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG reported a net income of 111.42M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNMBF and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNMBF has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to RYCEY (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNMBF dropped -43.75% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.

RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNMBF and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer