RNIN vs. BNO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RNIN (Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - RNIN is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bushido, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. RNIN is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, RNIN returned 41.34% vs 62.83% for BNO. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RNIN charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

RNIN vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNIN achieves a 30.02% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.

RNIN

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 8.28%
• 6M: 27.27%
• YTD: 30.02%
• 1Y: 41.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.34%

BNO

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 27.00%
• 6M: 52.90%
• YTD: 77.90%
• 1Y: 62.83%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 20.89%
• 10Y*: 15.06%
• ALL TIME*: 4.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	$107.13M	$97.34M	$147.52M
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	$576.14K	$321.31K	$205.27K

RNIN vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	30.02%	10.92%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	77.90%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RNIN and BNO is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

RNIN vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNIN

RNIN Risk / Return Rank: 94
RNIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
RNIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
RNIN Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RNIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RNIN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 52
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNIN vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNIN	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	1.32	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	1.90	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.24	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.90	1.70	+5.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.80	5.15	+18.65

RNIN vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNIN and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNIN vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNIN drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNIN and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNIN	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-87.06%	+81.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	-34.46%	+28.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-16.21%	+14.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-39.99%	+38.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	11.86%	-10.21%

Volatility

RNIN vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) is 6.41%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that RNIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNIN	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	17.47%	-11.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	40.96%	-28.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.08%	44.54%	-28.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.74%	36.41%	-20.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.74%	36.98%	-21.24%

RNIN vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNIN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNIN vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

RNIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	0.80%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNIN and BNO in my portfolio?

RNIN and BNO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNIN or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to RNIN (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNIN dropped -5.70% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, RNIN or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 62.83% vs 41.34% for RNIN. On fees, RNIN is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, RNIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNIN or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 62.83% return vs 41.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNIN or BNO?

RNIN is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNIN or BNO?

RNIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between RNIN and BNO?

RNIN is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Bushido and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for RNIN and 1.00% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.