PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNDV vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNDV vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNDV achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 11.28% return.


RNDV

1D
-1.01%
1M
8.04%
YTD
16.69%
6M
16.73%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNDV vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNDV
US Equity Dividend Select ETF
16.69%14.27%11.05%9.77%-7.55%28.99%5.51%27.34%-7.11%9.90%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RNDV and SCHB is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.68

The correlation between RNDV and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNDV vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNDV
SCHB

Technology

34.0%
34.4%

Healthcare

13.6%
8.9%

Financial Services

10.7%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
10.1%

Industrials

9.4%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
4.6%

Energy

5.0%
3.7%

Communication Services

4.8%
10.1%

Utilities

2.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.0%

Technology

RNDV
34.0%
SCHB
34.4%

Healthcare

RNDV
13.6%
SCHB
8.9%

Financial Services

RNDV
10.7%
SCHB
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RNDV
9.7%
SCHB
10.1%

Industrials

RNDV
9.4%
SCHB
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

RNDV
5.8%
SCHB
4.6%

Energy

RNDV
5.0%
SCHB
3.7%

Communication Services

RNDV
4.8%
SCHB
10.1%

Utilities

RNDV
2.6%
SCHB
2.3%

Real Estate

RNDV
2.4%
SCHB
2.4%

Basic Materials

RNDV
1.7%
SCHB
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNDV vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNDV
RNDV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RNDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RNDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNDV vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNDVSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.17

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

14.55

-3.20

RNDV vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNDV and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNDVSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.33

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.74

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.83

-0.22

Drawdowns

RNDV vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNDV drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNDV and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNDVSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-35.27%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-8.91%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-19.34%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-25.41%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.72%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-4.12%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.94%

+0.85%

Volatility

RNDV vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.01%. This indicates that RNDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNDVSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.01%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

9.14%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

12.12%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

17.24%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

18.32%

+0.55%

RNDV vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNDV vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

RNDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNDV
US Equity Dividend Select ETF
2.33%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNDV and SCHB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNDV has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to SCHB (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNDV dropped -37.44% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 5-year performance, SCHB leads with 12.76% vs 9.28% for RNDV. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RNDV.

RNDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.02% for SCHB.

RNDV tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RNDV and 0.03% for SCHB.

RNDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNDV and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer