RNDV vs. BUFX
RNDV (US Equity Dividend Select ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNDV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RNDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
RNDV vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNDV achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
RNDV
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 8.04%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 16.73%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNDV vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RNDV US Equity Dividend Select ETF | 16.69% | 10.16% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNDV and BUFX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNDV vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
RNDV
BUFX
RNDV vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNDV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNDV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 2.68 | -2.07 |
Drawdowns
RNDV vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNDV drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNDV and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNDV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.44% | -2.87% | -34.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -0.07% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -0.24% | -4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility
RNDV vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNDV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 3.98% | +9.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 3.98% | +12.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 3.98% | +14.89% |
RNDV vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RNDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
RNDV vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
RNDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNDV US Equity Dividend Select ETF | 2.33% | 2.70% | 2.55% | 3.10% | 2.52% | 1.95% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 4.09% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNDV and BUFX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RNDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RNDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
RNDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
RNDV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RNDV and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for RNDV and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer