PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RND vs. FTIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RND vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RND achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 25.81% return.


RND

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.38%
YTD
6.61%
6M
5.59%
1Y
26.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTIF

1D
0.65%
1M
0.40%
YTD
25.81%
6M
24.44%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RND vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RND and FTIF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024

0.41

The correlation between RND and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RND vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RND
FTIF

Technology

44.1%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
3.2%

Communication Services

14.2%

-

Healthcare

14.0%

-

Industrials

8.5%
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%

-

Financial Services

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%
20.1%

Energy

-

44.1%

Real Estate

-

12.1%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RND
44.1%
FTIF
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RND
16.0%
FTIF
3.2%

Communication Services

RND
14.2%
FTIF

-

Healthcare

RND
14.0%
FTIF

-

Industrials

RND
8.5%
FTIF
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

RND
1.2%
FTIF

-

Financial Services

RND
1.1%
FTIF

-

Basic Materials

RND
0.9%
FTIF
20.1%

Energy

RND

-

FTIF
44.1%

Real Estate

RND

-

FTIF
12.1%

Utilities

RND

-

FTIF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RND vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RND
RND Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RND Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RND Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RND vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNDFTIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

6.79

-5.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.26

20.14

-13.88

RND vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RND Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RND and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNDFTIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.48

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.75

+0.55

Drawdowns

RND vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RND drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RND and FTIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNDFTIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-27.83%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.56%

-5.46%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.50%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-6.00%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

1.84%

+2.45%

Volatility

RND vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) is 3.75%, while First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that RND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNDFTIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.05%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

10.55%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.70%

15.00%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.15%

18.96%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

18.96%

+2.19%

RND vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RND and FTIF have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

RND vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

RND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.11%1.45%2.88%1.55%
RND
First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RND and FTIF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to RND (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RND dropped -23.52% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

On 1-year performance, FTIF leads with 36.91% vs 26.80% for RND. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, RND has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 36.91% return vs 26.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RND and FTIF have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for RND.

RND tracks Bloomberg R&D Leaders Select Index, while FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RND and FTIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer