PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNAZ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RNAZ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transcode Therapeutics Inc (RNAZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RNAZ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RNAZ
Transcode Therapeutics Inc
26.06%-92.76%-98.45%-98.78%-73.50%-36.50%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-4.42%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%10.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNAZ achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return.


RNAZ

1D
0.35%
1M
-10.41%
YTD
26.06%
6M
-19.91%
1Y
-37.88%
3Y*
-96.75%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
2.86%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Transcode Therapeutics Inc

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Return for Risk

RNAZ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNAZ
RNAZ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RNAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RNAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNAZ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transcode Therapeutics Inc (RNAZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNAZVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.34

0.98

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.20

1.50

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.23

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

1.53

-2.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.94

7.29

-8.24

RNAZ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNAZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNAZ and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNAZVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

0.98

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.83

-1.27

Correlation

The correlation between RNAZ and VOO is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RNAZ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RNAZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNAZ
Transcode Therapeutics Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

RNAZ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNAZ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNAZ and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RNAZVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-33.99%

-66.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.22%

-11.98%

-47.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-6.29%

-93.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.19%

-3.72%

-85.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.47%

2.52%

+36.95%

Volatility

RNAZ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Transcode Therapeutics Inc (RNAZ) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that RNAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RNAZVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.76%

5.29%

+7.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.09%

9.44%

+56.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.05%

18.10%

+94.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

211.97%

16.82%

+195.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

211.97%

17.99%

+193.98%