RMRC vs. THNQ
RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while THNQ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. RMRC is actively managed, while THNQ is passively managed. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RMRC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.
Performance
RMRC vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RMRC
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
THNQ
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -10.56%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- YTD
- 24.60%
- 1Y
- 40.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $203.42K | $116.31K | $156.01K | |
| $1.75M | $1.81M | $2.49M |
RMRC vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 2.77% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 28.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMRC and THNQ is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMRC vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank
RMRC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
THNQ
RMRC vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMRC | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMRC vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMRC drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMRC and THNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMRC | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -50.56% | +43.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -15.41% | +14.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -14.88% | +13.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility
RMRC vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMRC | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 29.66% | -19.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 29.72% | -19.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 28.91% | -18.74% |
RMRC vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMRC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMRC vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison
RMRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than THNQ's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 0.58% | 0.00% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.16% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMRC and THNQ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMRC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMRC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.
RMRC has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.16% for THNQ.
RMRC is categorized as Actively Managed, while THNQ is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RMRC and 0.68% for THNQ.
Find the right allocation for RMRC and THNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer