RMRC vs. HTUS

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMRC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.

Performance

RMRC vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RMRC

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HTUS

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 2.82%
• 6M: 10.92%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 1Y: 22.67%
• 3Y*: 21.24%
• 5Y*: 14.82%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMRC vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	2.27%
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF	11.29%

Correlation

The correlation between RMRC and HTUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

RMRC vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMRC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HTUS

HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 76
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMRC vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMRC	HTUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.62	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.69	—

Drawdowns

RMRC vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMRC drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMRC and HTUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMRC	HTUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.57%	-47.50%	+40.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-0.68%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-4.04%	+2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RMRC	HTUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	12.01%	-1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.37%	19.09%	-8.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.37%	21.48%	-11.11%

RMRC vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMRC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMRC vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

RMRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than HTUS's 10.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF	10.70%	11.89%	17.80%	1.18%	5.63%	7.20%	3.77%	0.92%	8.69%	8.29%	3.02%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMRC and HTUS in my portfolio?

RMRC and HTUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RMRC or HTUS?

On fees, RMRC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMRC or HTUS?

RMRC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMRC or HTUS?

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.70%, compared with 0.59% for RMRC.

What is the main difference between RMRC and HTUS?

RMRC is categorized as Actively Managed, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RMRC and 0.97% for HTUS.