RMRC vs. HTUS
RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTUS is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RMRC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
RMRC vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RMRC
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 17.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $636.23K | $525.47K | $608.56K | |
| $203.42K | $116.31K | $156.01K |
RMRC vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 2.77% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMRC and HTUS is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMRC vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
RMRC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTUS
RMRC vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMRC | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMRC vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMRC drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMRC and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMRC | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -47.50% | +40.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -3.16% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -4.03% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.83% | — |
Volatility
RMRC vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMRC | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 12.20% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 19.09% | -8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 21.50% | -11.33% |
RMRC vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMRC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMRC vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
RMRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than HTUS's 10.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.97% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMRC and HTUS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMRC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMRC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.97%, compared with 0.58% for RMRC.
RMRC is categorized as Actively Managed, while HTUS is Equity Hedged. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RMRC and 0.96% for HTUS.
Find the right allocation for RMRC and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer