RMRC vs. HTEC
RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. RMRC is actively managed, while HTEC is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMRC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
RMRC vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RMRC
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTEC
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 34.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- -3.90%
- 10Y*
- —
RMRC vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 2.27% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMRC and HTEC is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMRC vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
RMRC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTEC
RMRC vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMRC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMRC vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMRC drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMRC and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMRC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -57.53% | +50.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -24.68% | +23.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -28.98% | +27.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.83% | — |
Volatility
RMRC vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMRC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 21.71% | -11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 24.67% | -14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 25.51% | -15.14% |
RMRC vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMRC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMRC vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
RMRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than HTEC's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMRC and HTEC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMRC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMRC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HTEC.
HTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.59% for RMRC.
RMRC is categorized as Actively Managed, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RMRC and 0.68% for HTEC.
Find the right allocation for RMRC and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer