RMRC vs. EMQQ
RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) and EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. RMRC is actively managed, while EMQQ is passively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RMRC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMQQ.
Performance
RMRC vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RMRC
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EMQQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 8.82%
- 6M
- -17.85%
- YTD
- -16.70%
- 1Y
- -16.54%
- 3Y*
- 2.31%
- 5Y*
- -7.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.12M | $1.19M | $1.72M | |
| $203.42K | $116.31K | $156.01K |
RMRC vs. EMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 2.77% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -9.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMRC and EMQQ is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMRC vs. EMQQ — Risk / Return Rank
RMRC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMQQ
RMRC vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMRC | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMRC vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMRC drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMRC and EMQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMRC | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -73.24% | +66.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -56.12% | +55.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -31.69% | +30.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.84% | — |
Volatility
RMRC vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMRC | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 21.15% | -10.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 32.76% | -22.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 30.59% | -20.42% |
RMRC vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMRC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMRC vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison
RMRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than EMQQ's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.71% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMRC and EMQQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMRC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMRC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.58% for RMRC.
RMRC is categorized as Actively Managed, while EMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RMRC and 0.86% for EMQQ.
Find the right allocation for RMRC and EMQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer