RMQHX vs. UOPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. UOPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1997.
Performance
RMQHX vs. UOPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. UOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund | -13.41% | 30.26% | 41.75% | 115.97% | -60.70% | 48.28% | 86.57% | 80.53% | -9.41% | 68.58% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RMQHX having a -12.99% return and UOPIX slightly lower at -13.41%. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed UOPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while UOPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 27.95% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
UOPIX
- 1D
- 6.83%
- 1M
- -10.46%
- YTD
- -13.41%
- 6M
- -11.71%
- 1Y
- 35.39%
- 3Y*
- 34.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 27.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. UOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than UOPIX's 1.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. UOPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
UOPIX
RMQHX vs. UOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.43 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.50 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 4.95 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.31 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.64 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.09 | +0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and UOPIX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. UOPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than UOPIX's 21.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund | 21.10% | 18.27% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 5.64% | 11.03% | 9.78% | 5.78% | 6.73% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. UOPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum UOPIX drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and UOPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -99.80% | +36.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -24.97% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -65.01% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -65.01% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -65.35% | +45.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -85.01% | +72.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 7.57% | -0.26% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. UOPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) have volatilities of 13.71% and 13.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 13.08% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 25.78% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 45.42% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 45.13% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 44.06% | +2.30% |