RMQHX vs. BMPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. BMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 3, 2001.
Performance
RMQHX vs. BMPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. BMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
BMPIX ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund | 14.94% | 9.09% | -5.35% | 15.30% | -16.22% | 38.93% | 18.27% | 25.13% | -26.81% | 34.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than BMPIX's 14.94% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed BMPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while BMPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.79% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
BMPIX
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- 14.94%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. BMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than BMPIX's 1.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. BMPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
BMPIX
RMQHX vs. BMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | BMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.70 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.19 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.12 | +0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 3.61 | +2.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | BMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.70 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.21 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.34 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.17 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and BMPIX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. BMPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than BMPIX's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BMPIX ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund | 1.58% | 1.81% | 0.94% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. BMPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum BMPIX drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and BMPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | BMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -84.22% | +21.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -21.39% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -38.50% | -24.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -61.41% | -1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -10.08% | -9.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -24.24% | +11.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 6.63% | +0.68% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. BMPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) at 9.41%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | BMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 9.41% | +4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 18.76% | +7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 31.60% | +16.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 29.59% | +16.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 32.07% | +14.29% |