PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMNY vs. BSMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMNY vs. BSMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMNY achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than BSMS's 0.32% return.


RMNY

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
0.92%
6M
2.13%
1Y
2.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSMS

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
0.32%
6M
1.24%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
2.20%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMNY vs. BSMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
0.92%2.35%0.86%
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
0.32%3.61%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RMNY and BSMS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.


RMNY vs. BSMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMNY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMS's 0.18% expense ratio.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMNY vs. BSMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMNY
RMNY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMS
BSMS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BSMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMNY vs. BSMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMNYBSMSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

1.07

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.66

1.32

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.24

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.64

5.37

-3.73

RMNY vs. BSMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the BSMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMNY and BSMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMNYBSMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.07

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.18

+0.29

Drawdowns

RMNY vs. BSMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMNY drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum BSMS drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMNY and BSMS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RMNYBSMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-14.95%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-1.05%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-1.59%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-5.06%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

0.68%

+1.35%

Volatility

RMNY vs. BSMS - Volatility Comparison

Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) at 0.49%. This indicates that RMNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RMNYBSMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

0.49%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

0.93%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

2.95%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.33%

3.61%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

6.28%

-0.95%

Dividends

RMNY vs. BSMS - Dividend Comparison

RMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than BSMS's 2.79% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
4.13%4.10%1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
2.79%2.79%2.81%2.58%1.56%1.49%1.61%0.46%