RMNY vs. SCMB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RMNY (Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. RMNY is actively managed, while SCMB is passively managed. Over the past year, RMNY returned 6.48% vs 4.38% for SCMB. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RMNY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

RMNY vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMNY achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 0.06% return.

RMNY

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -1.69%
• 6M: 1.45%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 1Y: 6.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.49%

SCMB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.78%
• 6M: -0.52%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 2.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF	$104.40K	$65.77K	$94.48K
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	$37.46M	$30.33M	$30.04M

RMNY vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF	1.72%	2.35%	0.80%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	0.06%	3.78%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RMNY and SCMB is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024	0.78

The correlation between RMNY and SCMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RMNY vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMNY

RMNY Risk / Return Rank: 85
RMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
RMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 67
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMNY vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMNY	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.73	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.46	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.35	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	1.79	+1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.29	5.53	+5.76

RMNY vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMNY and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RMNY vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMNY drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMNY and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMNY	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-6.13%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.28%	-2.92%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-1.86%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-1.30%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	0.94%	-0.29%

Volatility

RMNY vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMNY	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	1.02%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.95%	2.35%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83%	3.01%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.08%	4.12%	+0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.08%	4.12%	+0.96%

RMNY vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMNY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMNY vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

RMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than SCMB's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF	4.38%	4.10%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.26%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMNY and SCMB in my portfolio?

RMNY and SCMB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMNY or SCMB?

RMNY has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to SCMB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMNY dropped -5.70% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

Which ETF is better, RMNY or SCMB?

On 1-year performance, RMNY leads with 6.48% vs 4.38% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RMNY or SCMB?

Over the 1-year period, RMNY has performed better with a 6.48% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMNY or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMNY or SCMB?

RMNY has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 3.26% for SCMB.

What is the main difference between RMNY and SCMB?

They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RMNY and 0.03% for SCMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.