PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMS vs. CA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSMS vs. CA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSMS vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
0.23%3.61%1.00%0.57%
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
-0.08%3.05%1.51%0.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMS achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly higher than CA's -0.08% return.


BSMS

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
0.23%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
2.42%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*

CA

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSMS vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BSMS vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMS
BSMS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BSMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CA
CA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMS vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMSCADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

0.89

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.17

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.65

3.35

+2.30

BSMS vs. CA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the CA Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMS and CA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMSCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.89

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.57

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between BSMS and CA is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BSMS vs. CA - Dividend Comparison

BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than CA's 3.20% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
2.79%2.79%2.81%2.58%1.56%1.49%1.61%0.46%
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
3.20%3.14%3.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BSMS vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMS drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than CA's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMS and CA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMSCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-5.24%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-3.67%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-2.00%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-1.30%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.28%

-0.60%

Volatility

BSMS vs. CA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) is 0.45%, while Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that BSMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSMSCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

1.31%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

1.78%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

4.40%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.61%

4.09%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.29%

4.09%

+2.20%