RMNI vs. VT
RMNI (Rimini Street, Inc.) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, RMNI returned -8.45%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for VT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMNI vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMNI achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RMNI has underperformed VT with an annualized return of -8.45%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.
RMNI
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- -1.66%
- 5Y*
- -9.01%
- 10Y*
- -8.45%
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
RMNI vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMNI Rimini Street, Inc. | 5.15% | 45.32% | -18.35% | -14.17% | -36.18% | 34.76% | 14.18% | -24.66% | -34.89% | -20.18% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMNI and VT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2015 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMNI vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
RMNI
VT
RMNI vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rimini Street, Inc. (RMNI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMNI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.42 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 3.04 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 13.53 | -12.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMNI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 2.31 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.69 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.74 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.44 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
RMNI vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMNI drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMNI and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMNI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.93% | -50.27% | -35.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.32% | -9.67% | -33.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.89% | -16.51% | -53.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.93% | -26.38% | -59.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.93% | -34.24% | -51.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.89% | -0.88% | -63.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -7.02% | -36.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.06% | 2.17% | +22.89% |
Volatility
RMNI vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Rimini Street, Inc. (RMNI) has a higher volatility of 15.90% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that RMNI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMNI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.90% | 3.83% | +12.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.15% | 10.17% | +27.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.28% | 12.70% | +50.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.66% | 16.05% | +49.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.07% | 17.23% | +42.84% |
Dividends
RMNI vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
RMNI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMNI Rimini Street, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMNI and VT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMNI has higher volatility (15.90%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMNI dropped -85.93% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMNI and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer